I recently started
reading a novel that was published online as an ebook. I put it down after I realized that it was a
time travel story where the hero and main character was a writer researching a
time travel novel, clearly meant to become the “expert” in the story. A book with that premise can impress me, but
it only happens rarely.
Just as rare, one
might say, are the Einsteins of the world.
Patent clerks who revolutionize physics.
As you may have read [article here], a recent attempt to depose Einstein
was finally foiled. The
faster-than-light neutrino experiment was discovered to have been flawed. But, even if it had been accurate, we should
remember that the Speed of Light Constant is not the actual speed of light in
the physical world. It’s like Absolute
Zero. Nothing in the universe ever reaches
it, but the fraction is so close that we consider the ideal number and the
measured number to be functionally the same.
Now, I don’t know if
the number actually exceeded the “speed limit” set by the Speed of Light
Constant, just like I don’t know if the author of that novel I read handled the
absurd premise of his book well enough, because I did not read the book, and
because I don’t know the exact number of the Speed of Light Constant. But imagining the whole physics community
being fooled by something my high school science teacher knew is a lot like
putting down a book after only reading a few pages. I can, so I do.
I’m happy to hear
that the experiment was flawed, anyway.
I don’t know if I could take a revolution in physics right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment